Claim of Miller v. Pierson & Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Motion to substitute administratrix granted. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs to the claimant against the employer and its insurance carrier, upon the ground that the award of eight hundred and eighty dollars and seventy cents had vested. (State ex rel. Munding v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 92 Ohio St. 434; 111 N. E. 299; United Collieries, Ltd., v. Hendry, 2 B. W. C. C. 308; Price v. Westminster Brymbo Coal Co., 8 id. 257.) Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hinman, J., dissent on ground that “ compensation and benefits shall be paid…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Brown v. Central Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Claim of Harris v. Celbert Garage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Claim of Bartling v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Claim of Stickle v. Westcott GarageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942