Legal Opinion

Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Breeden

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton ■County. — T. M. McConnell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Mb.' Justice Williams

delivered the opinion of the ■Court.

The bank filed a bill of complaint against Breeden and Cook to recover on three notes, one for the sum of $500, another for the sum of $2,000, and the third for the sum of $1,000, which were executed by the Breeden Medicine Company, as maker, to the bank for money borrowed by that company; defendant Cook being treated for the purposes of this decision, as a surety thereon for a consideration paid by the company. Cook alone is contesting the payment of the notes; his •contention being that the bank had made a binding agreement with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Park Bank v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Barrett v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Uniontown Bank v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Kuhlman v. LeavensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Miller v. McCallenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Nat. Bank of Gulfport v. RauMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API