Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Breeden
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton ■County. — T. M. McConnell, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Mb.' Justice Williams
delivered the opinion of the ■Court.
The bank filed a bill of complaint against Breeden and Cook to recover on three notes, one for the sum of $500, another for the sum of $2,000, and the third for the sum of $1,000, which were executed by the Breeden Medicine Company, as maker, to the bank for money borrowed by that company; defendant Cook being treated for the purposes of this decision, as a surety thereon for a consideration paid by the company. Cook alone is contesting the payment of the notes; his •contention being that the bank had made a binding agreement with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Park Bank v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Barrett v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Uniontown Bank v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kuhlman v. LeavensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Miller v. McCallenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
3Cited by1 opinion
- First Nat. Bank of Gulfport v. RauMississippi Supreme Court · 1927