Fox v. Burden
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSabers, Justice
[¶ 48.] I concur on Issues 1, 2, 3 and 5.1 dissent on Issues 4 and 6.
[¶ 49.] I would reverse and remand to permit the amendment of Mother’s answers to interrogatories and to require a jury trial, including the claim for setoff.
[¶ 50.] I dissent on Issue 4 because the trial court erred in denying a jury trial.
[¶ 51.] 4. The trial court erred in denying a jury trial.
[¶ 52.] The trial court erred in denying a jury trial because this claim is in essence a claim for money damages. Under the constitution, any person has a right to a jury trial on claims for money damages. This absolute right to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Knowles v. United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- First W. Bank, Sturgis v. Livestock YardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Nizielski v. TvinnereimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.