Legal Opinion

C.M. St. P.R.R. v. Shoshone Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1941No. Nos. 6907, 6909, 6905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

— Three separate actions were instituted by the respective appellants, named in the caption hereof, for the recovery of taxes paid to Shoshone county under protest. The taxes were exacted and collected under the provisions of sec. 32-406, as amended by chap. 249, 1939 Sess. Laws, p. 612. The statute as amended is as follows:

“Section 32-406. Tax Levy — Certification—Limit— Collection — Special Fund____Whenever any school district shall lapse under the provisions of Section 32-327, Idaho Code Annotated, the County Superintendent of Public Instruction shall, until the entry of the order annexing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grice v. Clearwater Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Robinson v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In re GaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Continental Life Insurance & Investment Co. v. HattabaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Idaho County v. Fenn Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Thompson v. EngelkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API