Legal Opinion

Braznell v. Braznell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 6, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J. —

The complainant in the circuit court, appellee here, filed his bill for divorce charging the defendant, appellant, with habitual intemperance. An answer and cross bill, answer to the cross bill, supplemental answer and cross bill, answer to the supplemental answer and cross bill and supplemental amendment to the hill were lodged with the court by the respective litigants.

On these pleadings testimony was taken on the part of complainant, the transcription filling nearly four hundred pages.

At the conclusion of the introduction of the evidence offered on behalf of the complainant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Owens v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1861
  4. Richmond v. RichmondWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Finlayson v. LipscombSupreme Court of Florida · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Cole v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Blue v. BlueSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. McArthur v. McArthurSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API