Legal Opinion

Woodall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1920No. 11161PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Indictment for larceny; from Delvalb superior court — Judge Hutcheson. November 8, 1919. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. At the September adjourned term, 1918, the accused filed a demand for trial, which was allowed by the court and entered on the minutes. At the June term, 1919, his counsel filed a motion in which he alleged the filing of the demand, and that he had been present in court and ready for trial at every term since the demand was allowed, and he prayed the court “for a direction of a verdict of not guilty.” Treating this as a motion *9for discharge under the demand, it was properly overruled. Neither the motion nor the evidence introduced on the trial thereof showed that at the term when the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Roebuck v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Forbes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Googer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API