Matter of Ort.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This attorney-disciplinary proceeding arose from respondent’s representation of Mrs. Sophie Sawulak in the settlement of her late husband’s estate. The grievance originated as a fee-arbitration matter. The Fee Arbitration Committee administratively dismissed the matter and referred it to the Office of Attorney Ethics.
The District X Ethics Committee (DEC) concluded that respondent had violated RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate); RPC 1.5(a) (unreasonable fee) and RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate basis or rate of fee); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Matter of SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- In Re LoringSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- In Re WolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Matter of LunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MATTER OF LaVIGNESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- In re La VigneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- In re MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- JOHN MROZ VS. ETHEL HANDLER (C-0097-15, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- William S. Wong v. Terry RamnananDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026