Hoggins v. Becraft
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
„ •Lhakcery.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson
This is a suit' in Chancery, instituted by Wesley Hog-gbis, to rescind a contract with Aquilla Becraft, for a horse which lie had bought from said Aquilla, and to enjoin-a judgment which Jonathan Becraft, as assignee of iquilla, had obtained against hkn- fH-oggins) on a nota u , , for the price of the horse;
The bill contains appropriate and sufficient allegations; the principal of which are: 1st. that the horse was “thick or broken winded2nd. that the seller fraudulently concealed the defect^ — and, 3rd. that, within a reasonable time after a discovery by the- plaintiff, he returned the *29horse…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Tomkies v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Church v. Wright Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Buford v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
- Hogan v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Bell Grocery Co. v. Letts-Fletcher Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925