Legal Opinion

Hoggins v. Becraft

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 4, 1833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

„ •Lhakcery.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

This is a suit' in Chancery, instituted by Wesley Hog-gbis, to rescind a contract with Aquilla Becraft, for a horse which lie had bought from said Aquilla, and to enjoin-a judgment which Jonathan Becraft, as assignee of iquilla, had obtained against hkn- fH-oggins) on a nota u , , for the price of the horse;

The bill contains appropriate and sufficient allegations; the principal of which are: 1st. that the horse was “thick or broken winded2nd. that the seller fraudulently concealed the defect^ — and, 3rd. that, within a reasonable time after a discovery by the- plaintiff, he returned the *29horse…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tomkies v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Church v. Wright Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Buford v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
  4. Hogan v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Bell Grocery Co. v. Letts-Fletcher Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API