Singleton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was by information charged, with one John Doe, with obtaining from Ralph Mefford, by ex tortion, one Ford roadster; was tried separately, convicted by tbe jury and tbe punishment left to the court, and was sentenced by the court to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary at McAlester. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, overruled, and the defendant has appealed to this court.
The testimony on behalf of the state, in substance, is that Ralph Mefford was living with Mr. J. A. Rhodes, two miles north and one mile west…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Whitten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Walton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jamison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936