Legal Opinion
Adam Smith (#70741) v. Sheryl M. Ranatza
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided March 17, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00106Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ADAM SMITH (#70741) CIVIL ACTION NO. VERSUS 25-106-SDD-SDJ SHERYL M. RANATZA NOTICE Please take notice that the attached Magistrate Judge’s Report has been filed with the Clerk of the U. S. District Court. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), you have 14 days after being served with the attached report to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations set forth therein. Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations within 14 days…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Baker v. PutnalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.