Legal Opinion
Smith v. Frazzini
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 5, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-F-298PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Review Taxation of Costs, filed October 23, 1991. Plaintiff has responded. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I
On September 30, 1991, the Court entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Defendant Frazzini and against Plaintiff. On October 10,1991, Defendants submitted a Bill of Costs requesting $7372.77. After a hearing via telephone, the Clerk of the Court entered costs in the amount of $552.55. The Clerk of the Court disallowed *678the following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 972, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,527 Warren G. Herold v. Hajoca Corporation, Warren G. Herold v. Hajoca CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Chaparral Resources, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Cleverock Energy Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Martin Trepel and Trepel Petroleum Corporation, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Richard Bright D/B/A Augusta Dairies v. Land O'lakes, Inc. And Norris Creameries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Doris J. Mikel v. Robert S. Kerr, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Federal Beef Processors, Inc. v. CBS INC.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1994