Legal Opinion

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s proofs do not fully sustain her alleged cause of action.

On appeal by defendant Windsor Besidences, Inc., the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event.

Appeal from the order should be dismissed.

On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.*

Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

See, also, Rufo v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 268 App. Div. 1057, and cf. McCabe v. Cohen, 268 App. Div. 1064.— [Rep.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rufo v. South Brooklyn Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. McCabe v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945