Legal Opinion
Pizarro v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 1967No. Civ. 24747PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHOEMAKER. P. J.
On July 27, 1961, the Industrial Accident Commission made special findings in regard to petitioner’s claim against several defendants, including the real party "in interest. The commission found that a compromise and release, approved by order of July 29, 1960, relieved all defendants from further liability with the exception of the real party in interest. Petitioner was awarded the sum of $4,461.86 plus $500 attorney’s fees, reasonable future medical and surgical expenses, together with interest thereon at the rate of 7 percent from the date of the award.
On June 18, 1964, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Vickich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Greitz v. SivachenkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gamble v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hoffman v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Koszdin v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Patterson v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Abraham v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Franczak v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.