In re Zarro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent was served with a petition that contained six charges of professional misconduct against him. Charge Six was withdrawn and Charge Two was partially withdrawn by the Grievance Committee. In his answer, the respondent denied violating the Disciplinary Rules. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained all five charges against the respondent. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm, and the respondent cross-moves to disaffirm, the Special Referee’s report.
Charge One alleged that the respondent engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re WolasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999