Legal Opinion

In re Zarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was served with a petition that contained six charges of professional misconduct against him. Charge Six was withdrawn and Charge Two was partially withdrawn by the Grievance Committee. In his answer, the respondent denied violating the Disciplinary Rules. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained all five charges against the respondent. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm, and the respondent cross-moves to disaffirm, the Special Referee’s report.

Charge One alleged that the respondent engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WolasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API