Legal Opinion

In re of Reading Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1987No. Bankruptcy No. 71-828Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

This case comes before me on the petition of the Reading Company to enjoin Reading Anthracite Company (“Anthracite”) from interfering with coal fill (“culm”) removal in St. Clair, Schuylkill County. Previously, a temporary restraining order was issued that allowed Reading to remove and sell the culm and to deposit the proceeds in an escrow account. Several evidentiary hearings were held, and based upon them, I make the findings of fact and reach the conclusions of law set forth in this memorandum. For the reasons that follow, I will grant Reading’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Williams v. BridySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Hall v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Fleck v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API