Legal Opinion

Sanders's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1909No. Appeal, No. 45PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 45, April T., 1909, by James J. Purman et al., from decree óf O. C. Greene Co., Sept. T., 1905, No. 2, in partition in Estate of Elizabeth Sanders, deceased. Petition for partition. Before Inghram, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was decree setting aside the allotment of the purparts, but otherwise confirming the inquest.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

Elizabeth Sanders died intestate, seized of land, and leaving to survive her five children, one of whom was a married daughter who subsequently died intestate, without issue, and leaving her husband to survive her. After her death, he filed a *80petition for partition, to which, in response to a rule to show cause, the respondents filed an answer denying the jurisdiction of the orphans’ court. To this answer the petitioner filed a replication and upon consideration of the pleadings and the evidence submitted upon depositions the court overruled the objection and awarded a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Law v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Bolton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Estate of DanhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Galbreath v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  5. Ragan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yarnall EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Hanley v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Lloyd's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Becker EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Galliford's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Allegheny County · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API