Blakeman v. Puget Sound Iron Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
Blakeman instituted this action for the purpose of compelling the corporation defendant to transfer to him two thousand five hundred shares of its capital stock, of which he claimed to have become the owner by reason of his purchase thereof at sheriff’s sale under execution against one C. H. Simpkins. The court found that the latter was the owner of five shares of the stock in controversy, and gave judgment that the same be transferred to the plaintiff, as prayed for in the complaint. From that and the order denying him a new trial he has appealed. From the record it appears that the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Nat. Bank Etc. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- George R. Barse Live Stock Co. v. Range Valley Cattle Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- Bacon v. Traders Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1921