Legal Opinion

Molfino v. Yuen.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2014No. SCWC-10-0000150PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

At issue in this appeal is whether this court should impose a duty of reasonable care on the Planning Department of the County of Hawai'i to a property owner, leading to potential negligence liability for damages allegedly sustained due to the Planning Department’s failure to maintain all pertinent correspondence in its property files at all times. We hold that policy considerations counsel against the judicial creation of such a legal duty under the common law, and also hold that there is no basis under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (“HRS”) Chapter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Takayama v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State of Hawai'i Organization of Police Officers v. Society of Professional Journalists-University of Hawai'i ChapterHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Cornel v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. O'Grady v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Christopher Salem v. Alan ArakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Cornel v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
  5. David v. BhanotDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API