Legal Opinion
Gadberry v. Schlesinger
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 26, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-0187-RPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, members of the Virginia Air National Guard, bring this action challenging certain Air Force grooming regulations. Having previously disposed of several issues, the Court must now determine whether the regulations involve impermissible sexual discrimination as contended by plaintiffs. Memoranda by all parties have been submitted in support of their respective positions and there being no controverted factual disputes, the matter is ripe for disposition on cross-motions for summary judgment.
The parties agree that the regulations establish different…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schlesinger v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blanken v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
- Gadberry v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977