Legal Opinion

Carlos Pacheco v. Oregon Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 19, 2019No. 77525-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CARLOS PACHECO, No. 77525-1-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE V. PUBLISHED OPINION OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, Respondent. FILED: August 19, 2019 APPELWICK, C.J. — Pacheco filed a claim under the underinsured motorist insurance coverage under a policy provided by Oregon Mutual. The policy expressly excluded coverage for diminished value and loss of use. Pacheco sought discretionary review from denial of his motion to determine that both exclusions are contrary to RCW 48.22.030 and violate public policy. We hold that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API