Legal Opinion

Harner v. USAA General Indemnity Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 10, 2022No. 3:18-cv-01993Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL HARNER, an individual, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01993-LL-MDD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1, 2, 14 USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY 5, AND 6 AND GRANTING-IN- COMPANY, a Texas Corporation; DOES 15 1 through 50, PART MOTION IN LIMINE NOS. 3 AND 4 16 Defendant. 17 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 18 AND GRANTING-IN-PART 19 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NOS. 2 AND 3 20 21 [ECF Nos. 43, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57] 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 Plaintiff PAUL HARNER (“Plaintiff”)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. Kenneth G. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Major v. Western Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API