Legal Opinion

Catharine Fout v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1816PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court below was moved to quash the indictment for not having a prosecutor indorsed as required by the Act of 1801, c. 30; 1803, c. 59, and refused the motion; the now plaintiff in error, being the person indicted in the court below, appealed. And now it is urged that the bill of indictment was prepared and sent, not by the attorney-general, but by one who signs himself John Wilkerson, acting as solicitor-general. We are of opinion, unanimously, that no indictment ought to be sent to the grand jury without the sanction and approbation of the solicitor-general, proved by his signature on…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. State v. Superior Oil, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. Calvin HeadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Grey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API