Legal Opinion

Andreozzi v. California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2007No. 06-15888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Leroy A. Andreozzi, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the California Department of Corrections (CDC) and several CDC employees in his civil rights action for injunctive relief alleging that CDC regulations requiring inmates to maintain short hair violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson County, Oregon, 372 F.3d 1128, 1133 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Southern Oregon Barter Fair v. Jackson County, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (PC) Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API