Fitts v. Fitts
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Rusk. The verdict of the jury commenced “we, “ the jury, find the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, relative to “ the divorce prayed for, to he true,” and then continued, as stated in the Opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hemphill, Ch. J.
This was a suit, by the wife, Nancy Fitts, for divorce, on the ground of cruelty. There having been no appeal by the defendant, from the judgment for divorce, the decree will not in this particular be reversed ; the errors, if any, being such as are not apparent on the record. But, the plaintiff insisting that she has been aggrieved by the disposition that has been made of the property, we will examine her grounds of complaint.
*446She alleged in her petition, that she was entitled to two tracts of land, certain negroes named, some cattle, and a yoke of oxen, which, by deed of gift…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thornberry v. ThornberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
- Fishli v. FishliCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822
- Dejarnet v. DejarnetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hedtke v. HedtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Eggemeyer v. EggemeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Cunningham v. CunninghamTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1907
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.