Legal Opinion
Jarrett v. Scofield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 31, 2001No. [No. 31, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
In 1944, J. Wilbur Jarrett, the appellant, bargained and sold unto Scofield Brothers, the appellees, by written contract, certain timber standing on his property in the Taylors Island Election District of Dorchester County. One of the covenants of this contract was for quiet enjoyment, expressed in the following language:
“That the said parties of the second part shall have (legal — J. S.) quiet and peaceful possession of the land while cutting and removing said trees and timber, and shall not be involved in any (just — J. W. J.) disputes as to the right to cut and remove said trees and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Andrus v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Crisfield v. StorrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Peterson v. ReishusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Baugher v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jefferson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Archway Motors, Inc. v. HermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Net Realty Holding Trust v. NelsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1976