Legal Opinion

Michelin Tire Corp. v. Goff

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 20, 2002No. 2000746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This case involves claims by Randall A. Goff against his employer, Michelin Tire Corporation ("Michelin"), and his supervisor, Ron Morgan, related to the termination of Goff's employment by Michelin.

With respect to Goff's claim against Michelin, the trial court determined, as a matter of law, that an employee handbook issued by Michelin constituted a unilateral contract of employment between Michelin and Goff. The trial court therefore submitted to a jury Goff's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dykes v. Lane Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Gross v. Lowder Rlty. Better Homes & GardensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Hickman v. Winston County Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Stinson v. American Sterilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Colston v. Ala. Agric. & Mech. Univ. (In re Hugine)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API