Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ward

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George C. Hitchcock, Judge. (1) In an action by a third person against alleged partners, testimony showing participation in the profits of the alleged partnership, and that there was no written agreement of partnership, establishes a prima-faeie case that the defendants are partners. Goddard Peck Gro. Co. v. Berry, et al., 58 Mo. App. 665, 666; "Willoughby v. Hildreth, Í82 Mo. App. 82, 91; Skinner v. "Whitlaw, 184 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George C. Hitchcock, Judge. (1) In an action by a third person against alleged partners, testimony showing participation in the profits of the alleged partnership, and that there was no written agreement of partnership, establishes a prima-faeie case that the defendants are partners. Goddard Peck Gro. Co. v. Berry, et al., 58 Mo. App. 665, 666; "Willoughby v. Hildreth, Í82 Mo. App. 82, 91; Skinner v. "Whitlaw, 184 Mo. App. 22!9, 239-240; Ellis v. Brand, 176 Mo. App. 383, 392 and 393; Reyburn v. Bennett, 176 Mo. App. 451, 460; Graf Dist. Co. v.…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This is an action, originally instituted before a justice of the peace, upon an account for goods, consisting of automobile tires, tubes, etc., alleged to have been sold and delivered, on and between April 8 and August 8, 1912, to the defendants, Edward W. Ward, Oscar J. Mueller and Adolph Grohe, as copartners, doing business under the name and style of New York Motor Car Company. The defendants other than Oscar J. Mueller made no defense, and judgment went against them by default. Mueller filed a verified answer denying that he was ever a partner with Ward and Grohe, doing business as the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vincent v. MeansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. Torbert v. JeffreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Campbell v. DentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. State v. HuffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Perrette v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. TodhunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. R. S. Howard Co. v. International BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Moller-Vandenboom Lumber Co. v. BoudreauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API