Legal Opinion

Penn v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 22, 1919No. 10172Published

Before Whaley, County Judge, Richland, July term, 1918. Action by Maggie B. Penn against the 'Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. Directed verdict for the plaintiff for actual damages and for defendant on the question of punitive damages, and plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Before Whaley, County Judge, Richland, July term, 1918. Action by Maggie B. Penn against the 'Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. Directed verdict for the plaintiff for actual damages and for defendant on the question of punitive damages, and plaintiff appeals. Exception: It is respectfully submitted that his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, erred in directing a verdict as to punitive damages and directing, on motion of defendant’s attorney, a verdict for actual damage in the sum of $2.20, in that: (a) There was but one cause of action and not separable; (b) it should have been submitted to the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

Action by passenger against a carrier for actual and for punitive damages.

Direction of a verdict for the plaintiff on so much of the action as was for actual damages, and for the defendant on so much of the action as was for punitive damages.

Appeal by the plaintiff.

Det the one exception be reported.

The circumstances of the case are these: The plaintiff bought at the Union Station in Columbia a ticket _ from Columbia to Florence. Betwixt these termini there are two routes by the carrier; the one in common from Columbia to Sumter, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacHen v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  2. Smith v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Griffin v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Carter v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API