People v. Mario T.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia
Following a hearing, the respondent Mario T. was adjudicated delinquent based on his possession of cocaine and cannabis and sentenced to one year’s probation. On appeal, the respondent contends that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence. We agree and reverse.
BACKGROUND
Prior to the adjudicatory hearing, the respondent filed a motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence. The respondent alleged that the police lacked justification for a protective pat-down search that resulted in the recovery of illegal drugs.
At the suppression hearing,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. LomaxAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- In re Rafeal E.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- In re D.L.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.