Legal Opinion
People v. Doe
Utica City Court
Decided February 2, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold H. Hymes, J.
The defendant is 17 years of age, with no prior record or arrest, and is therefore held to be a person eligible to be considered a youthful offender if he were convicted. The trial was therefore held before a single-Judge court, pursuant to CPL 340.40 (subd 7).
The defendant was charged with three offenses: disorderly conduct, in violation of subdivisions 1, 3, and 6 of section 240.20 of the Penal Law (a violation); assault in the third degree, in violation of subdivision 1 of section 120.00 of the Penal Law (a class A misdemeanor); and resisting arrest, in violation of section 205.30 of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacques v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. AileyBuffalo City Court · 1974
- People v. Lyke, New York County Courts1973
- People v. BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- SOLONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- In re Christopher B.New York Family Court · 1984