Legal Opinion

Presto Plastic Products Co. v. Ball & Jewell, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified so as to grant consolidation of the Municipal Court action with the Supreme Court action upon condition that the defendant’s cause of action, as a counterclaim, be tried separately by a jury prior to the trial of the plaintiff’s equitable cause of action. Defendant Ball & Jewell, Inc., shall have the right to open and close upon the separate jury trial of its counterclaim. The equity trial may then proceed before the same justice hearing the jury issue. The order, as so modified, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. 123 Lafayette Avenue Corp. v. LipsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gitter v. SchiffNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Doran Lumber Corp. v. James Talcott, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Teperman v. Atcos Baths, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  5. Walsh v. Sunny Bay Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API