Blanchard Press, Inc. v. Stanton
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurrence
Mr. Justice Cothran: I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Watts, but, with great respect for him and his views, I desire tO' express my impressions of this case.
The plaintiff, claiming to be a holder in due course of the note in question, brought suit upon it, after the refusal of the defendant to pay it. The defendant answered the complaint, alleging that the noté was obtained by fraudulent misrepresentations and was without consideration. ■ She also set up a counterclaim for $1,000.00, which she paid in cash at the time the alleged contract was entered into.
The case was tried by Judge…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eskridge v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Levy v. Doerhoefer'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Plank v. SwiftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Florence v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Harris v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.