Legal Opinion

Schnupp v. Blair Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 11, 2025No. 1:17-cv-02335Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES ex rel. TIMOTHY SCHNUPP, Relator, v. Civil No. ELH-17-2335 BLAIR PHARMACY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this qui tam case,1 filed on August 15, 2017, Timothy Schnupp, the Relator, sued his former employer, Blair Pharmacy, Inc. (“BPI,” “Blair Pharmacy,” or “Pharmacy”), and its owner, Matthew Blair (“Mr. Blair”) (collectively, “Blair”), pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA” or the “Act”),

31 U.S.C. §§ 3728

et seq. See ECF 1 (“Complaint”). At the relevant time, BPI was a compounding pharmacy.2 Schnupp,…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  5. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API