Legal Opinion

Parker v. Dales

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1933No. 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The first error relied upon and strenuously urged to this court is that the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to make a finding of facts separate from its conclusions of law, and in refusing to answer said interrogatories.

By §§11463 (now 11420-17), 11470 (now 11421-2) and 11471 (now 11421-3 GC) there isn’t any doubt but that when a case is tried to the court without a jury, a party to the litigation, upon timely request, is entitled to have a finding of facts separate from the conclusions of law, when the case is decided, and to have proper interrogatories answered by said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisk v. GlechoffOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Heiland v. HildebrandOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Kelly v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API