Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Schiffner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1940No. 29217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error has appealed from an order denying the confirmation of sale in. a foreclosure proceeding. On the 23rd day of February, 1940, plaintiff in error filed, brief, and the authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error. No brief has been filed by the defendant in error and no excuse has been offered for such failure. As stated in Watkins v. Holcombe, 170 Okla. 513, 41 P. 2d 59, it is not the duty of the court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the judgment. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to set aside the order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. R. Watkins Co. v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peppers v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API