Legal Opinion
Foreman v. Skeif
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 2014PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered April 4, 2013, which granted defendant Jihad Skeif s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
*569Skeif presented unrefuted evidence that the vehicle operated by codefendant Ira H. Foreman made a left turn across the path of Skeif s oncoming vehicle in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141, and that he applied his brakes, but could not avoid the collision (see Griffin v Pennoyer, 49 AD3d 341, 341-342 [1st Dept 2008]). Skeif properly supported his motion with admissible evidence…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franco v. Rolling Frito-Lay SalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Griffin v. PennoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cadeau v. GregorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3Cited by5 opinions
- African Sarac-Marshall v. MikalopasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Palau v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Maysonet v. EAN Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Aguila v. BenitezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Revels v. SchoepsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016