Legal Opinion

Zabka Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, No. 81PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The appellant was employed by Rhea’s Bakery as a cleaning woman. She advised her employer that she could not perform her duties because the detergents that she used were causing a skin irritation. The record clearly reveals that the employer then offered her other work (assisting the bakers) during the night shift, which work did not require the use of detergents. She refused this work because her husband objected to her working at night. Her present contention is that no other job was offered to her.

Irene McDonough, the employer representative, testified that the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kernisky v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Baker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Berkery v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API