Legal Opinion

Dekker v. Vivint Solar, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 8, 2021No. 3:19-cv-07918Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 GERRIE DEKKER, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, No. C 19-07918 WHA 12 v. 13 VIVINT SOLAR, INC., et al., ORDER RE VIVINT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 14 Defendants. AND MOTION TO COMPEL 15 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this action for unfair business practices, defendants move for judgment on the 19 pleadings, repeating many arguments addressed in previous orders. For many of the same 20 reasons stated in those previous orders, this motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN 21 PART. 22 STATEMENT 23 A prior order details…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Fleming v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API