Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentBazelon, Chief Judge
I agree that Article 24 is not a work preservation agreement but rather a union signatory agreement. The validity of the Board’s decision thus turns on whether it properly adopted the finding of the Administrative Law Judge that the owner-operators of Santini were “independent contractors” and not “employees”. On consideration of that issue, I find myself in a maze of precedents with few standards for decision discernable. I, of course, note that Congress has quite clearly commanded that the common law definition of “independent contractor” be the basic guide for distinguishing between…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.