Legal Opinion

Oglesby v. SE Nichols, Inc. by Noecker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1991No. 903SC221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff alleges the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. A motion for summary judgment will be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” N.C.R. Civ. P. 56(c); Stoltz v. Burton, 69 N.C. App. 231, 316 S.E.2d 646 (1984). “Summary judgment is proper even in a negligence case where the forecast of evidence fails to show defendant’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Ratliff v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Morgan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Jerry Bayne, Inc. v. Skyland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API