Legal Opinion

Finklea v. Garrick

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1932No. 1 Div. 995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O. B. Finklea, appellant, here, brought his suit in the court below, against D. S. Garrick, appellee, to recover of him, said Garrick, the sum of $4,500 alleged to be due by virtue of a certain contract entered into between said parties concerning the purchase and sale of certain cattle.

Under the plaintiff's version of the facts, he purchased from the defendant 200 head of cattle at $8 per head, to be delivered by defendant to plaintiff, at defendant's place on November 1, 1927; that $500 of the purchase money was paid in cash on that day, and the remainder was to be paid on the delivery of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bender v. ChewSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Long v. AddixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Moss v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Baker v. Lehman, Weil & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. LloydAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Finklea v. GarrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API