Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. v. Holliday
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
663 S.W.2d 824 (1984)
HENRY I. SIEGEL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,
v.
Edna HOLLIDAY, Respondent.
No. C-1891.
Supreme Court of Texas.
January 11, 1984.
Rehearing Denied February 22, 1984.
Neel & Sortino, Anthony T. Sortino, Houston, for petitioner.
Hinds & Meyer, Mona Lyman, Houston, Hilgers, Watkins & Kazen, Thomas H. Watkins, Austin, for respondent.
BARROW, Justice.
Petitioner, Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. (Siegel), sued respondent, Edna Holliday, along with Alfred and Barbara Graham to collect on a sworn account. Siegel is a creditor of now-dissolved Holly Gram, Inc. (Holly Gram). Mrs. Holliday and the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Ray; Dissent · Robertson.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
- Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- R. M. Waggoner v. Herring-Showers Lbr. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Fagan v. La Gloria Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.