Legal Opinion

Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. v. Holliday

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. C-1891Published

1Opinion of the Court

663 S.W.2d 824 (1984)

HENRY I. SIEGEL COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,

v.

Edna HOLLIDAY, Respondent.

No. C-1891.

Supreme Court of Texas.

January 11, 1984.

Rehearing Denied February 22, 1984.

Neel & Sortino, Anthony T. Sortino, Houston, for petitioner.

Hinds & Meyer, Mona Lyman, Houston, Hilgers, Watkins & Kazen, Thomas H. Watkins, Austin, for respondent.

BARROW, Justice.

Petitioner, Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. (Siegel), sued respondent, Edna Holliday, along with Alfred and Barbara Graham to collect on a sworn account. Siegel is a creditor of now-dissolved Holly Gram, Inc. (Holly Gram). Mrs. Holliday and the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Ray; Dissent · Robertson.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. R. M. Waggoner v. Herring-Showers Lbr. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fagan v. La Gloria Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API