Legal Opinion

319 East 50th Street Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), entered June 3, 1992, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 and upheld an order of respondent that determined the adjusted initial legal regulated rent for the subject apartment upon consideration of the tenant’s Fair Market Rent Appeal ("FMRA”), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s failure to raise at the administrative proceeding the argument that the tenant, whose apartment was vacant during the period between January 1 and June 30, 1974, was ineligible to maintain a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Realty v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Ullman Estates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. MATTER OF ULLMAN ESTATES v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parcel 242 Realty v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Jemrock Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & CommunityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API