Legal Opinion

Leister's License

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1915No. Appeal, No. 75Published

Appeal, No. 75, Oct. T., 1914, by Martin Grube, from- order of Q. S. Huntingdon Co., Feb. Sessions, 1914, No. 6, refusing a distiller’s license In re Application of Martin Grube. Petition for a distiller’s license. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order quoted in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The questions raised by the first two assignments of error are the same as those considered in Reiners’ Appeal, ante, p. 190, and need not be further discussed.

The final order is quoted and alleged as error in the fourth assignment of error, and was in these words: “And now March 3, 1914, after a full hearing both on the part of the petitioners for and the remonstrants against the granting of a license to the within applicant and after due and careful consideration of the case, taking into consideration the number and character of both the petitioners for and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gross's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Gemas's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Cochran's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Reed's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Reznor Hotel Company's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API