Legal Opinion
City of Coeur D'Alene v. Simpson
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 2006No. 29299Published
1Opinion of the Court
136 P.3d 310 (2006)
142 Idaho 839
The CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Respondent,
v.
Jack W. SIMPSON and Virginia S. Simpson; and Beach Brothers, Inc., an Idaho corporation, Defendants-Counterplaintiffs-Appellants.
No. 29299.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, October 2005 Term.
April 27, 2006.
John F. Magnuson, Coeur d'Alene; Runft Law Offices, PLLC, Boise, Idaho, for appellants. John F. Magnuson argued.
Quane, Smith, Coeur d'Alene, for respondents. Michael L. Haman argued.
SUBSTITUTION OPINION.
THE COURT'S PRIOR OPINION DATED FEBRUARY 8, 2005, IS…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.