Legal Opinion

Marshall v. SPEEDEE CASH OF GEORGIA

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 17, 2008No. A08A1057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following the dismissal of her case against Speedee Cash of Georgia, Arber Marshall appeals, contending that the trial court erred in holding that a pawn transaction with a term of 30 days did not violate OCGA § 44-12-137 (a) (7), which prohibits pawnbrokers from providing for a maturity date of less than one month. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

In reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss, an appellate court must construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the appellant with all doubts resolved in the appellant’s favor. A motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MulkeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Alexander Properties Group, Inc. v. DoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Ewing v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Hooks v. Cobb Center Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Burmaster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. GMC Group, Inc. v. Harsco Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Betancourt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. ChoicePoint Services, Inc. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Ex parte E.L.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API