Legal Opinion

Firestone v. Mishler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Flkhart Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit to recover possession of personal property. Firestone had caused an attachment to issue against the property of a person, other than the appellee, which was, by the officer, levied on the property in dispute. The officer notified Mishler of such facts. In two paragraphs of the answer, these facts are pleaded. One paragraph was decided to be bad on demurrer, and the other was not noticed. Ey the demurrer, .the question is presented, whether, after the motion given, the appellee was confined to the proceeding, to try the right of property, provided in chap. 5, 2 E. S. p. 493-7? See, also,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. SheltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Patterson v. SnowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. McFerran v. SwaynieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Small v. FinchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API