Legal Opinion

Kanealii v. Hardy

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PREAR, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to approve or pass upon'the sufficiency of the bond of the petitioner as a member of the board of supervisors of the county of Kauai, under section 21 of Act 39 of the Laws of 1905, known as the County Act.

The petitioner sets forth in substance that he was a candidate for the office of supervisor at large for the county of Kauai at the election held June 20, 1905, that he received a majority of all the votes cast at said election for said office, that he received a certificate of election…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherwood v. State Board of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. People Ex Rel. Wood v. Board of Assessors & Collector of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Mitchell v. WarfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Speed v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Harris v. CooperHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SherwoodHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kumalae v. KalauokalaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kumalae v. KalauokalaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lucweiko v. PrattHawaii Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API