Legal Opinion

City of Lansing v. Edward Rose Realty, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1992No. Docket 116531, 116532PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

In these condemnation actions, the City of Lansing seeks permanent easements through two apartment complexes owned by defendants for the purpose of allowing Continental Cablevision to provide cable television service to tenants of the complexes. The proposed condemnation is supported by an ordinance passed by the Lansing City Council that authorizes condemnation proceedings upon the request of a cable televi sion franchisee. Defendants appeal by leave granted from an order upholding the validity of the proposed condemnation and with regard to certain underlying orders involving evidentiary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Pere Marquette Railroad v. United States Gypsum Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. City of Center Line v. ChmelkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amsat Cable Ltd. v. Cablevision of Connecticut Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Continental Cablevision of Cook County, Inc. v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. City of Lansing v. Edward Rose Realty, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Novi v. Robert Adell Children’s Funded TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Amsat Cable Ltd. v. Cablevision Of Connecticut Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API