Legal Opinion

Recio v. Kent Security Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1999No. 98-20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Rolando Recio (claimant), appeals from an order of Appellee, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, affirming the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. We disagree with the conclusion that claimant left his employment without good cause and reverse.

The basic facts of this case were outlined in this court’s first opinion in Recio v. Kent Sec. Servs., Inc., 683 So.2d 164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), and will not be repeated here. Upon remand from this court, a new hearing was conducted wherein claimant introduced his pay stubs and an earnings summary prepared from them, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kan v. PG Cook AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. LeCroy v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Platt v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Poppe v. Eclectic Business MacHinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Martin v. Golden Corral Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Knight v. Palm City Millwork and Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
  2. OCEAN CLUB COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CurtisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Martinez v. FORD MIDWAY MALL, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Ogle v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Rivera v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API